On reading ‘Beloved’

Photo by Elina Krima on Pexels.com

In the first week of January I was flying home from a short break in the States. One of the in-flight movie selections was a documentary about Toni Morrison. I listened with awe, not just at her extraordinary life of survival, but at her capacity to express it, verbally and on the page. I noted the Pulitzer and that she was a Nobel laureate. She also received the Presidential Medal of Freedom. In short, a literary giant. And, I had not read a word of her’s.

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Beloved – harrowing and affirming

And so, eyes dancing between Baldwin, Michelle Obama and ‘Beloved’, I knew it was time for a little Toni Morrison. And, I am still recovering from the emotional punch. For those, like me, to whom this is unfamiliar, it tells the story of an escaped slave girl just after the Civil War, in Ohio in the 1870’s. She has escaped her persecutors, but is now persecuting herself as she realises that she cannot escape her past.

Plenty of the novel is harrowing, even when it is being utterly compelling. What really affected me was to learn subsequently that Morrison based it on a true account. The protagonist, Sethe, having been raped whilst pregnant, and whipped so badly that her back is decorated with open wounds and scars that resemble a tree with many branches, has managed to cross the Ohio River. She is seeking refuge with the mother of her partner, who has had her freedom bought by the son’s sacrifice of his own liberty.

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

Three of her children have gone ahead. She is heavily pregnant. Her partner never arrives. As she makes her way, she gives birth to her youngest with the help of a white girl, Amy. She makes it to 124, the place where ‘Baby Suggs’, the freed grandmother to her new baby, is now retired and preaching, to join her other children, a two year old girl and two boys. All seems well until her brutal owner tracks them down and comes with accomplices to reclaim his human property. What then follows is the act upon which the tale hangs.

It will be revisited but we spend much of the rest of the novel in a time eighteen years hence. Sethe is living with her surviving baby daughter, Denver. They live in the house “124”, that had been home to Denver’s grandmother, Baby Suggs, who is now dead. The house, once a happy refuge for escaping slaves, is now haunted by Denver’s dead sister. Sethe had managed a headstone for her grave. She could not afford ‘Dearly beloved’ which she had heard in church, and so, paying with her body, she has a stone memorialising ‘Beloved’. Beloved is the spirit haunting them.

Paul D had been a slave at ‘Sweet Home’, where Sethe had worked and been abused and had partnered with Halle, Denver’s father. After eighteen years he has found her and we learn that he had always carried an image of her in his mind and always felt that she was the girl he would and could love. His own experiences have been brutalising and harsh, including the lynching that took place at the time of her escape. He manages to exorcise the ghost at 124, and to persuade a highly sceptical Denver that they could all live together as a family, after a successful social outing.

On their return they are greeted by a remarkable young woman, with no knowledge of her own history, and remarkably unmarked and unlined skin and hands. She cannot account for her new and good footwear. Sethe takes her in, but Paul D is bothered by her presence. We come to know her as ‘Beloved’ and we have to suspend our disbelief. She is a very physical presence, but is clearly a manifestation of the adult that the baby spirit who had haunted 124, would have grown into. Denver is convinced she is her sister, and Sethe comes to see her as the dead daughter. Paul D is too unsettled. He loses a battle of wills with the new arrival and leaves.

As time passes Beloved, little more than waif and stray, grows fat. She feeds on Sethe’s pain and as the older woman declines in physical health, the young woman thrives but becomes more demanding. Sethe refers to her sexual abuse at ‘Sweet Home’ and how they “took my milk”. Beloved takes her milk, metaphorically, at the end of the story. Denver breaks from the claustrophobic household and attempts to engage with the world outside the house. She is on the point of succeeding when the dreadful denouement plays out. Paul D has returned to the area, and Stamp Paid has told him about the dark past that is associated with the house. He shows him a newspaper cutting but Paul D cannot read.

Nonetheless his reaction sears itself on the reader’s memory. It shouts out the differences between the oppressed and what we are coming to understand and weigh as ‘white privilege’. He is alarmed by the picture on the old newspaper cutting because “there was no way in hell a black face could appear in a newspaper if the story was about something anybody wanted to hear”.

Photo by Dazzle Jam on Pexels.com

We learn that when the ‘Schoolteacher’, the sadistic slave owner, had come for Sethe and her children, she had attempted to kill them all rather than have them returned to slavery. The boys were injured and subsequently ran away. The two year old was killed by use of a saw blade on her throat. Sethe was about to dash the baby’s brains out by swinging her against a wall, when the elderly black, Stamp Paid, grabbed the baby.

The novel is like an extended exam course for psychotherapists. It obviously deals with trauma, but also projection, through ‘Beloved’s’ arrival, and the significance of the maternal tie. It introduces the need and the problems with ‘othering’, both in skin colour and gender. It damns a sinner and gives her no redemption, and it explores the problem of repressed memory and how the unconscious forces its needs and drives into the conscious world. Morrison creates a verb – to ‘rememory’.

Brutalising experiences have caused the repression of memory. They cannot be simply remembered. However, the magic of the verb is we understand that Sethe is recovering a memory, rather than simply remembering. And, she is not sure she wants to recover it. We see the intrusion of the past into the present, which is the foundation for most people’s needs to have therapy or analysis – to break out of ‘stuckness’ and to stop recurring cycles of behaviour. We see this through the device of the supernatural, and the character of Beloved.

Sethe’s pain is exquisitely but agonisingly portrayed. Any part of her true self could be used. It could be her body, her offspring, her love and as she understands, even her mind. To her the whites could “not just work, kill or maim you, but dirty you.” It creates the madness that allows her to contemplate and execute infanticide. “Dirty you so bad you couldn’t like yourself anymore. Dirty you so bad you forgot who you were”. She can see only one solution, “she could never let it happen to her own. The best thing she was, was her children.” As Stamp Paid tells Paul D when he finally accepts what had happened at ‘124’ and what Sethe had done to her daughter, “she ain’t crazy. She love those children. She was trying to out hurt the hurter”.

Reading ‘Beloved’ is to get ready for some emotional bruising, and to shudder that this was not an implausible tale, nor were several of its worst elements uncommon. It chills me to recall that it was based on a true story. I am very glad, after all this time, that I have read it and discovered Toni Morrison’s work.

On reflecting: How an introduction to psychoanalytic and jungian thinking changed me

Over the past year I have had the very great pleasure of participating in a course called Psychotherapy Today. At the end of the course there is a suggestion that one might write a ‘reflective essay’. For those planning to pursue training in the field, it is encouraged. As I am about to go on holiday, and hopefully, indulge in some thinking and reflecting time, I re-read my essay. I think it conveys just how exploring the mind and perspectives of the mind, can change one. I am profoundly grateful to have been a participant and it has helped me become clearer about what my Second Innings might entail.

Psychotherapy Today: Its significance to me: A Reflective Essay: 2000 words

A reflective essay on Psychotherapy Today. How should one reflect on something that has changed one and one’s perspectives over ten months? My dictionary tells me that reflective is not just about returning an image back from whence it came, but also ‘meditative’. I shall attempt to convey what the course’s significance was to me and reflect what came my way, but also to demonstrate what having meditated on the past several months has done for me. 

Unsurprisingly, I find myself yielding to feelings of sadness. One expects to have to mourn, and to process something, that provided a monthly sense of intellectual and psychic purpose. A small death, a little grieving. Also, profound gratitude. I developed strong feelings of unity with group members, admiration for Wayne Full as our first co-ordinator, and for Ruth Calland’s remarkable light touch facilitation of our group sessions.  I am grateful too, for the awareness that I now see the world with a refreshed vision, which has been a pleasant outcome.

Knowing yourself is the beginning of all wisdom according to Aristotle. What the course allowed me to consider was that cognitive acts and emotional responses are different, and that one is attempting to think in terms of integration. This became a key theme for me. Speaking about things and not from them, will be common to the majority, and was certainly a truth for me. Now, I think I may be understanding my emotional language. I read a paper co-written by David Bell that referred to bringing psychic materials to consciousness, and it has been a developing sense of understanding of that process that has particularly affected me. 

I look back on the man who started the course in the summer of 2018. In the previous twelve months, I had got divorced and accepted a redundancy package. I found myself telling people that I was “considering psychotherapy training”, but the truth was that I did not really know what it was, or might entail. Inspired by Mike Brearley, who I knew through cricket contacts, I had applied to the Institute of Psychoanalysis’s summer school and its series of ‘Maudsley Lectures’. I had a sense that this might be preparation for clinical training, but the core truth was that I had joined the course with no real sense of where it might lead me. I was more interested in what I might learn about my relationship with myself, which was largely one of intense internalised criticism. I knew I wanted to reorient my relationships with others, and not just because of my fresh acquaintance with the divorce courts. 

As this is a reflection, and meditative, I have decided to review it in a chronological format, but as I sit here now in July 2019, I find my recall is directed to the Titian ‘Flaying of Marsyas’ image that lit up our first seminar, and the seminars that were focused on trauma, on defences, and on narcissism. Whenever we role played, I enjoyed it, and despite my misgivings, I got a particular joy from our work exploring the importance of play.

Our first seminar day in October asked ‘What is a Mind?’ and we had read Hart’s paper on Titian’s ‘The Flaying of Marsyas’. The image is arresting and visceral. It was new to me, but has not left me since. I became fascinated by the themes of exposing previously unexposed layers and of getting through to the rawness of an individual. We also read Margaret Arden’s paper exploring Freud’s interest in literature. At that time, I had found myself thinking, ‘have I found my tribe?’ And this seemed to be a confirmation. The relationships of the arts to psychoanalytic thinking has been one of the great discovered pleasures for me; a means of seeking and understanding meaning. My enthusiasm was fired. It did not diminish at any point in the ensuing months. 

The course moved on to ‘mapping the landscape’, and this helped us consider models of the mind. The case study familiarity had appeal for me. I had no strong sense then that I might want to train, but this was probably a moment when considering it more seriously began. There was therefore a natural segue for me when December introduced us to Observation. The wonderful film of the newborn and its mother predictably had me thinking about my own mother, but also about how my ex-wife and I had parented our three children. My sense of belonging was developing. The relevance of the Meredith-Owen paper (‘On revisiting the opening chapters of Memories, Dreams, Reflections’) has become very strong for me now that I am in my own analysis. It is a paper that invariably prompts a smile on my face as I read it. 

In January, we gave space for trauma and neuroscience. This was very affecting for me. In my professional career, I had witnessed a suicide, as a young investment banker threw himself to his death in our Canary Wharf building. I realised that I had not considered that event since probably no more than two or three days afterwards. It was repressed. Now it began to have an impact. Annie Pesskin’s seminar was amongst my favourites and I have since enjoyed reading her blog contributions. It was about the time that I began my own blogging, albeit about a wider range of subjects than psychoanalytic theory, but I am working through what my unconscious motivations might have been.

As a sometime asthmatic, and a childhood eczema sufferer I was excited to understand more about the psyche and soma and so February’s ‘body in mind, mind in body’ held my attention. Some of the seminar days proved quite gruelling, and I was aware that sometimes my attention drifted, but that this also had meaning.  No drifting in this month. The prevalence of language around thin and thick skins, and ‘second skins’ has always had meaning for me, without me ever truly understanding what that might be, and this was a very productive and fascinating period of the course. By now I was pursuing options to be in analysis.

It was therefore useful and pertinent that March should be about ‘diving deeper’, as I started to get a greater sense of the analyst/analysand relationship and what informs what, in the relationship. Now that we were over half way I began to understand just how effectively and cleverly the seminar days had been constructed, to move us on and to let us cope with more demanding and intensive material. This had me in a wonderfully receptive and curious minded mode for seminars on Defences. I found this the most satisfying of our monthly sessions, perhaps because it gave all of us some very personal insight. David Gardiner was thought provoking when thinking about defences, not merely as obstacles, but as guides. Intellectualisation and Omnipotence held particular interest for me.

By May, the first sense of endings loomed, not least because our exceptional course co-ordinator had to step down to handle some personal issues. His absence was felt keenly, and his departure prompted a lot of discussion on what impact it had on us all. We were looking at group dynamics at the time, which felt appropriate to dealing with a departing individual. I had the further fortunate coincidence that in my current Birkbeck Business Psychology studies I had just begun a module on Group Processes, and the pioneering work of Henri Tajfel, so this session had a powerful impact for me. 

I think we all found the ability to role play in the May seminar quite liberating, but also informative, in how it affected us. In my group, it had a more profound impact than I think most of us had anticipated. Thinking about race and alternative group classifications that inspire ‘othering’ was sobering. In the realm of psychoanalysis, it was interesting to think about how, these group associations have led to the phrase ‘unconscious biases’ being adopted as common parlance.

As course completion loomed we had a day on sex and sexuality. It proved to be the most challenging for our group. I was not alone in noting that at the end of it I felt as tired as I had done at any point in the course. All of us found exploring the many issues that came up very demanding, but I think many shared my impression that paedophilia absorbed a phenomenal mount of psychic energy. That said, it gave more impetus to the candour of views and experiences shared in our group sessions, which had become the thing to which I most looked forward, and from which I think I drew most satisfaction.

Our closing seminar was on narcissism. Alongside defences, this was the seminar day when I found the use of case studies most interesting and revelatory. The understanding we give to the phrase and meaning of ‘biting the hand that feeds’ was very powerful for me, and was some evidence, I thought of my developing sense of working with imagery and word choice.

And so, it ended. I know I am changed by the experience. I have a curiosity and an appetite to train. I have found myself an extraordinary group of new friends who are remarkable in their responses, in their intellects, and in our diversity. I have had few richer life experiences. I find myself thinking much more deeply about non-verbal communications than ever before, and I find deeper connections in visual art, in playwriting and in all the dialogues that I now have; much more so, I think than would ever have been possible without Psychotherapy Today. The idea of the huge submerged, unseen iceberg image of the unconscious is very much part of how I conduct my personal interactions now.

The course met its aims, for me. I feel I have had comprehensive introduction to psychoanalytic and Jungian psychotherapy. It has reordered my thinking – about society and politics and about the arts. It has stimulated my appetite for more learning. The 

reading demands were broad, but never overwhelming. My reading is constantly drawn to ideas of individuation and integration. Somehow, I feel much more alive. I think I have stirred my unconscious and it is changing me. 

For future joiners of the course, I would say that it is likely to make you want to be in your own analysis and that, for me, that has been a profound and wonderful, stimulating experience, although no analysand would suggest that any of it is an ‘easy’ experience, and quite often is very demanding. I have loved how it has made me reinterpret art and drama, my experiences of which all seem significantly richer. The candour of new friends has accelerated my friendship formation. I feel able to be much more ‘open’ with people I meet after such a generous ten months. 

It has deepened my sense of trust, just at a time when public levels of trust and our political discourse seem to be faced in quite another direction. I feel more able to handle ‘difficult’ conversation subjects, especially with my parents and my sibling. Other people seem to react differently to me too. Perhaps driven by unconscious signalling there are many of my long and short-term acquaintances who now seem to feel the desire to ‘unburden’ themselves to me. 

To repeat, the end of the course is triggering some senses of loss, but overwhelmingly, I feel a sense of gratitude.